Photo Art credit: GQ. Read Rebecca Nelson’s interview of Springer.
Ed. NOTE: If US Presidential hopeful Donald Trump was before a ‘finder of fact’ in a criminal rape case, RINJ would complain the candidate shouldn’t be in a presidential race until the matter is dealt with, then shut up.
That is not the case. More than that, “Jane Doe” who on November 2, 2016 was a no-show at her own press conference withdrew the case before Ronnie Abrams – NY District Court Judge amidst controversy including a return address that turned out to be an abandoned house in California.
On/Off Jane Doe Law Suit Against Donald Trump Alleging Rape Smacks of Jerry Springer Antics to the Benefit of Hillary Clinton.
Above all it is a Campaign ‘Trick’ that sexually vilifies or objectifies women & children & helps keep a serial child sex trader out of prison.
Our research indicates a Jerry Springer former ‘producer’ may have exploited a woman by coaching her (“Jane Doe”) to bring a civil lawsuit against Trump in the final lap of a tight presidential political race in the United States.
‘Jane’s case alleges that an infamous billionaire sex-offender named Epstein who raped her many times also procured her for the sexual service of Donald Trump at one of Epstein’s hundreds of sex ‘parties’ that she voluntarily attended. The case is complicated by Epstein, a child sex trader who is a BFF to both candidates in this muck-raking.
There have been several attempts to exploit this alleged case which has been withdrawn and resubmitted three times in the latter part of the presidential election campaign.
An effort by Norm Lubow (Gerry Springer Show) posing as someone other than himself to sell to media outlets for $1 million a copy of a video tape of the alleged survivor, ‘Jane Doe’ telling her detailed account of a rape, further discredits the case. We don’t know if there were any takers.
Apparently this matter will never be heard by a criminal finder of fact. It is safe to say that somebody wants to influence the outcome of the US presidential election by objectifying children and women – unwittingly they exposed a decision of Jane Doe to keep evidence away from the FBI that could have helped the prosecution of a serial child-sex trader, years ago.
In New York State, rape should be brought to a State’s Prosecutor for criminal prosecution; the police in other words. The District Court Judge should know that and would have directed the matter accordingly if that applied. Perhaps it did not apply. Read the definition of rape.
Even though the alleged grievance (this is before a civil court therefore it is a ‘grievance’ not a ‘crime’ ) took place in 1994 there is no statute of limitation in New York State that applies to ‘Rape’; ‘Criminal sexual act’; ‘Aggravated sexual abuse’; nor ‘Course of sexual conduct against a child’. Hence, the crime of rape committed at any time is a police matter. Other felony sex offences, including statutory rape (where sex is voluntary) have a limitation of 5 years after which they cannot be prosecuted as a crime. (“Statutes of Limitations for Sexual Assault ” By Brittany Ericksen, Staff Attorney Ilse Knech)
The RINJ Foundation is alarmed at the exploitation of Ms. Jane Doe’s matter by Hillary Clinton and moreover that both USA presidential candidates seem to be BFF’s (despite a significant stigma resulting from a sex-offender conviction for sex trading kids) to a sex offender, co-defendant Jeffrey Edward Epstein in the Jane Doe matter who allegedly “provided” the child to Trump and presumably others. Epstein has contributed hugely to the perpetuation of the child sex trade in the United States.
Don’t Buy A Kid – End Child Sex Trade Campaign: It is especially frustrating that the evidence of Jane Doe could have locked away a serial child sex trader (USA level 3 sex-offender) if brought forward even ten years ago.
The timing of the allegations is more than inappropriate. It is so “Jerry-Springer-like” it is inclined to condemn prosecutors’ chances for a conviction in this and other ongoing sex offender criminal matters.
Shame on all parties. Rape is no joke. Turning this into a media circus of mud-slinging was wrong-minded.
This has joined a string of rabble-rousing American political muck storms, but the price of it is the tainting of the jury pool around the world.
This story falls in the midst of a presidential election campaign with connections to a notoriously tacky television personality who campaigns for Trump’s opponent, and connections to a man who the American media call a pedophile (primary or exclusive sexual attraction to prepubescent children). He is certainly not convicted of being a pedophile but is a buyer of fully ‘developed’ busty adolescent children for sex. Pedophiles are ill people who do not choose their predilection and who wish they weren’t pedophiles. Epstein’s behaviour, said the finder of fact, is wilful crime and a chosen unlawful and wilful behaviour likely to be repeated.
Trump has vigorously denied the allegations as completely unfounded.
Says Gerry Springer on Twitter, “Hillary Clinton belongs in the White House. Donald Trump belongs on my show.” Springer trivializes a very serious matter: Epstein and his child sex trading. He buys girls and provides them to his friends.
Somebody is claiming that Trump was one such “friend”. But for political campaign reasons law enforcement has been denied the opportunity to bag a serious asshole, using the street vernacular to describe a sociopath who buys and exploits your children, America!
Rape is a very serious crime in the United States, a country that jails more of its citizens than any country on earth. Had there been a rape (definition) in New York State, done by Trump, a criminal court where the burden of proof is beyond a reasonable doubt should be hearing the case, not a trial-by-media, civil law suit against one of the candidates at the end of a presidential election campaign.
The burden of proof in a civil case is light; cases are decided on the balance of probability. The jury is allowed to guess.
Judge Ronnie Abrams will get her day in the limelight and a chance to thank her democratic benefactors who gave her the job. She has slated an initial status conference in the civil lawsuit for 16 December in a New York district court.
Judge Abrams, a democrat from New York was nominated by Senator Kirsten E. Gillibrand, a Democrat from New York, who supports Hillary Clinton, a former Democrat Senator from New York. She was appointed by sitting Democrat President Barrack Obama who has been playing a boisterous role in the Clinton vs Trump election campaign.
The complainant is asked to submit allegations and the defendant is to submit their defence. Presumably there will be a requirement for notice of the allegations to be sent to the defendant in order to prepare a response.
Everyone in this matter appears to be a Clinton supporter, although some hide behind aliases, it doesn’t take much sleuthing to unearth the identities.
When asking questions of this matter The RINJ Foundation learned a major international newspaper, highly reputable, and one of the top three international dailies in the world, was digging into this story and published their article here which is well worth a read.
The allegations are against convicted sex offender Mr. Epstein and Mr. Trump.
Trump has no political experience but is the nominee of the opposing (to Clinton) ‘Republican Party’. It shows. He threw a political grenade relating to a 1975 rape case that an experienced candidate would not have touched with a ten foot pole. A bomb came back.
Trump raised questions about Clinton’s insensitivity to a 12-year-old rape survivors plight and to hers and her husband’s involvement with registered sex offender Epstein who owned an infamous sex-play island where very young female model types entertained guests like Bill and Hillary Clinton.
That fact does not implicate Hillary Clinton in any sexual wrongdoing but does clearly indicate that Hillary Clinton knows about the behaviour of her BFF Epstein and continues to exploit that connection for money.
* He is a major donor to The Clinton Foundation.
* Epstein is a convicted buyer of adolescent children for sex.
* Bill Clinton has been the guest of Epstein at least a couple dozen times and Hillary was no stranger either.
In response to Trump’s allegations of Clinton’s insensitivity in the 1975 case, Clinton supporters rigged the “Jane Doe” case along with a few others maybe? It doesn’t matter. Both sides are doing horrible damage to the concept of the rights of women and gender equality. Think about it.
FBI Jumped Through Hoops Gathering Evidence on Obvious Crime
Epstein’s butler has been charged by the USA Federal Bureau of Investigations FBI for concealing evidence (which he tried to exploit for financial gain) that would have assisted in additional charges against Epstein who has something like a dozen outstanding civil cases pending or in the process of being settled out of court. Clearly Epstein has earned his level 3 Sex Offender classification. Moreover it is clear that the nature of Epstein’s crimes are known to the public, including Jane Doe who waited more than eight years after Epstein’s conviction, imprisonment and release all of which were public events, well- noted in the general media.
It is so hard to authenticate an old case when the evidence is buried in the dark cobwebs of decades ago. Sadly, it is normal for a rape survivor to be afraid to bring their allegations forward. But that timidness would steer an authentic witness far away from leviathan presidential election campaigns.
Where was Jane Doe Then.
The FBI was forced to spend considerable effort in exasperating undercover work trying to gather evidence against years of child exploitation. Prosecutors tried every legal steeplechase manoeuvre to convict the dodgy Epstein.
There is a certain tiny percentage of sexual assault allegations — less than 2% of all sexual assault allegations — that reek of falsehoods. We do not believe that this is one of those cases but do believe that its timing gives the matter an appearance of being a malicious and frivolous set of allegations manufactured by election campaigners working for Clinton. The election gambit that uses Jane Doe no matter how zealous her support for Clinton may be and no matter how agreeable she may be to being used is still exploitative, even if the risk to the complainant is mitigated by anonymity.
Epstein is a co-accused in the anonymous Jane Doe case against Trump which is a condemnation of Trump that brings him into the same cesspool that Hillary Clinton has allegedly been swimming in with Epstein and her husband for years.
Jane Doe v.Trump and Epstein (1:16-cv-04642, SDNY) has been filed three times. The allegations do not sound like prosecutable crimes against Trump which would explain why the case is going before a civil court, but they are allegations that should have been brought to law enforcement when they needed the information in the very serious Epstein case in 2008.
Jane Doe may have committed a crime in all this by keeping important information against Epstein away from the Courts all these years. Action is improbable.
Jane Doe now conveniently for the Clinton campaign alleges she was also sexually assaulted by Trump on an occasion of partying with Mr. Epstein, among other persons in 1994 at Epstein’s Manhattan home.
Apparently that this alleged assault by Trump was a happenstance in a series of assaults done by convicted sex offender Epstein during many parties hosted by Epstein involving gaggles of very young model-types who loved the lure of enormous wealth and the money this activity put in their pockets. (Describing the phenomenon that has frustrated FBI efforts to assemble witnesses against the wealthy disgraced financier Epstein.)
New York In The Roaring 90s
Defining the type of sex that took place in New York State in 1994 has a few tests. Fortunately the laws have changed somewhat.
Was there criminal intent? Was there a criminal act? Was there consent. (Consenting to sex with an adult is not possible for a minor child below the “age of consent [17 in NY, 1994]”.)
Voluntary sex between an adult 21 or over and a young person under the age of 17 was in 1994 “third degree rape”, punishable on conviction by a sentence of 15 to 48 months in prison.
This allegation sounds familiar inasmuch as the pleadings of the successful prosecution of Epstein ending in 2008 were about female model-types volunteering for sex for a generous fee.
In a theocracy or ecclesiocracy such as what one finds in the United States (‘In God We Trust’) you will find many hypocrisies such as in Hollywood where young models must sex their way to the top and therefore think it is “normal”. In product advertising on the screen where dazzling and ‘shapely’ young models are the norm to sell anything, like school books, sodas or cosmetics.
The 1990s hypocracy is in the implied statement that one needs to be an attractive-looking young model and beneficiary of the attention of an excessively rich guy in order to be the best you can be; the male needed to ‘posess’ a few of these females; but if you are the ‘rich guy’ the state will prosecute you. This was an era of over-the-top female objectification.
This is not a very good way to raise children.
Meanwhile, nearly 400 million Americans will never share this extraordinarily wealthy lifestyle and quietly resent it, therefore it is the ultimate ‘zinger’ to throw at a senior-citizen billionaire presidential candidate.
We spoke to three judges discreetly about this matter and each one said that prima facia they would have turned away or deferred the case because of the timing and maybe because of the antics involved in selling the video tapes plus a deliberate effort to obscure the motive and the people behind the case.
Norm Lubow (Gerry Springer Show) is pretending to be a publicist by the name of Al Taylor or something to that effect where Al Taylor and Norm Lubow are one and the same person who manage this case on behalf of the Jane Doe. Some of the antics are so ludicrous they are not worth discussing.
Tit for Tat Election Dirty Trick?
What is worse is that this New York State matter seems to have come to light only after another case was brought up in early summer by the Trump campaign when refuting Clinton’s claim to be standing for “women and children”. Clinton, as a lawyer, had defended a rapist in 1975 and has been repeatedly criticized in the years since for making rape jokes and for victim blaming.
In August of this year, we learned that the child rape survivor came forward for the first time in 40 years to call Hillary Clinton a ‘liar’. This is one of the saddest tales of injustice you will ever read about.
“Clinton defended her rapist by smearing her, blocking evidence and callously laughing that she knew he was guilty,” says Kathy Shelton, 54, who was 12 years old when she was raped by Thomas Alfred Taylor in Arkansas.
“Kathy Shelton was just 12 years old when a 41-year-old drifter raped her on the side of a desolate Arkansas road in 1975. Now, four decades later, she has agreed to be named and pictured for the first time in this Daily Mail article because she is furious that her rapist’s defense attorney – Hillary Clinton – has been portraying herself as a lifelong advocate of women and girls on the campaign trail.” — Alana Goodman for The Daily Mail … read more…
Damage Done by Sub-clinical Sociopaths who become Politicians
This election campaign rich-men-rape ploy opens the door to a new set of future low-road political stunts that both vilifies and objectifies women and children. It taints the jury pool and implies malfeasance of a victim-witness where there is none. Once again Jane Doe is victimized whether she knows it or not. It brings great shame on the United States and its Rome Empire conduct.